Accuracy vs. Precision vs. Recall in Machine Learning: What is the Difference?

In Machine Learning, the efficacy of a model is not just about its ability to make predictions but also to make the right ones. Practitioners use evaluation metrics to understand how well a model performs its intended task. They serve as a compass in the complex landscape of model performance. Accuracy, precision, and recall are important metrics that view the model's predictive capabilities.

Accuracy is the measure of a model's overall correctness across all classes. The most intuitive metric is the proportion of true results in the total pool. True results include true positives and true negatives. Accuracy may be insufficient in situations with imbalanced classes or different error costs.

Precision and recall address this gap. Precision measures how often predictions for the positive class are correct. Recall measures how well the model finds all positive instances in the dataset. To make informed decisions about improving and using a model, it's important to understand these metrics. This is especially true for binary classification. We may need to adjust these metrics to understand how well a model performs in multi-class problems fully.

Understanding the difference between accuracy, precision, and recall is important in real-life situations. Each metric shows a different aspect of the model's performance.

Classification Metrics

Classification problems in machine learning revolve around categorizing data points into predefined classes or groups. For instance, determining whether an email is spam is a classic example of a binary classification problem. A DMARC provider plays a critical role in ensuring email security by verifying that only legitimate senders are authorized to send emails on behalf of a domain. As the complexity of the data and the number of classes increases, so does the intricacy of the model. However, building a model is only half the battle. Key metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall from the confusion matrix are essential to assess its performance. Metrics provide insights into how well the model achieves its classification goals. They help identify improvement areas to show if the model aligns with the desired outcomes. Among these metrics, accuracy, precision, and recall are foundational.

The Confusion Matrix

The confusion matrix is important for evaluating classification models. It shows how well the model performs. Data scientists and machine learning practitioners can assess their models' accuracy and areas for improvement with a visual representation.

Significance

At its core, the confusion matrix is a table that compares the actual outcomes with the predicted outcomes of a classification model. It is pivotal in understanding the nuances of a model's performance, especially in scenarios where class imbalances exist or where the cost of different types of errors varies. Breaking down predictions into specific categories provides a granular view of a more informed decision-making process to optimize models.

Elements of Confusion Matrix

• True Positive (TP): These are the instances where the model correctly predicted the positive class. For example, they are correctly identifying a fraudulent transaction as fraudulent.
• True Negative (TN): The model accurately predicted the negative class. Using the same example, it would be correctly identifying a legitimate transaction as legitimate.
• False Positive (FP): These are instances where the model incorrectly predicted the positive class. In our example, it would wrongly flag a legitimate transaction as fraudulent.
• False Negative (FN): This is when the model fails to identify the positive class, marking it as negative instead. In the context of our example, it would mean missing a fraudulent transaction and deeming it legitimate.

Visual Representation and Interpretation

The diagonal from the top-left to the bottom-right represents correct predictions (TP and TN), while the other represents incorrect predictions (FP and FN). You can analyze this matrix to calculate different performance metrics. These metrics include accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Each metric gives you different information about the model's strengths and weaknesses.

What is Accuracy in Machine Learning?

Accuracy is a fundamental metric in classification, providing a straightforward measure of how well a model performs its intended task.

Accuracy represents the ratio of correctly predicted instances to the total number of instances in the dataset. In simpler terms, it answers the question: "Out of all the predictions made, how many were correct?"

Mathematical Formula

Where:

• TP = True Positives
• TN = True Negatives
• FP = False Positives
• FN = False Negatives

Significance

Accuracy is often the first metric to consider when evaluating classification models. It's easy to understand and provides a quick snapshot of the model's performance. For instance, if a model has an accuracy of 90%, it makes correct predictions for 90 of every 100 instances. However, while accuracy is valuable, it's essential to understand when to use it. In scenarios where the classes are relatively balanced, and the misclassification cost is the same for each class, accuracy can be a reliable metric. For example AI text classifiers often report "Accuracy" in most studies about detection efficacy.

Limitations

Moreover, in real-world scenarios, the cost of different types of errors might vary. For instance, a false negative (failing to identify a disease) might have more severe consequences than a false positive in a medical diagnosis.

Diving into Precision

Precision is a pivotal metric in classification tasks, especially in scenarios with a high cost of false positives. It provides insights into the model's ability to correctly predict positive instances while minimizing the risk of false alarms.
Precision, often referred to as the positive predictive value, quantifies the proportion of true positive predictions among all positive predictions made by the model. It answers the question: "Of all the instances predicted as positive, how many were positive?"

Mathematical Formula

Where:

• TP = True Positives
• FP = False Positives

Significance

Precision is important when false positives are costly. 

In certain applications, the consequences of false positives can be severe, making precision an essential metric. For instance, in financial fraud detection, falsely flagging a legitimate transaction as fraudulent (a false positive) can lead to unnecessary investigations, customer dissatisfaction, and potential loss of business. Here, high precision ensures that most flagged transactions are indeed fraudulent, minimizing the number of false alarms.

Limitations

Precision focuses solely on the correctly predicted positive cases, neglecting the false negatives. As a result, a model can achieve high precision by making very few positive predictions, potentially missing out on many actual positive cases. This narrow focus can be misleading, especially when false negatives have significant consequences.

What is Recall?

Recall, also known as sensitivity or true positive rate, is a crucial metric in classification that emphasizes the model's ability to identify all relevant instances.

Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases correctly identified by the model. It answers the question: "Of all the actual positive instances, how many were correctly predicted by the model?"

Mathematical Formula:

Where:

• TP = True Positives
• FN = False Negatives

Significance

Recall is important in scenarios where False Negatives are costly.

Example:

Similarly, a high recall ensures that most threats are identified and addressed in a security system designed to detect potential threats. While this might lead to some false alarms (false positives), the cost of missing a genuine threat (false negatives) could be catastrophic.

Both examples emphasize minimizing the risk of overlooking actual positive cases, even if it means accepting some false positives. This underscores the importance of recall in scenarios where the implications of false negatives are significant.

Limitations

The recall metric is about finding all positive cases, even with more false positives. A model may predict most instances as positive to achieve a high recall. This leads to many incorrect positive predictions. This can reduce the model's precision and result in unnecessary actions or interventions based on these false alarms.

💡 Recommended: The 10 Computer Vision Quality Assurance Metrics Your Team Should be Tracking. 

The Balancing Act: Precision and Recall

Precision and recall, two commonly used metrics in classification, often present a trade-off that requires careful consideration based on the specific application and its requirements.

The Trade-off Between Precision and Recall

There's an inherent trade-off between precision and recall. Improving precision often comes at the expense of recall and vice versa. For instance, a model that predicts only the most certain positive cases will have high precision but may miss out on many actual positive cases, leading to low recall.

This balance is crucial in fraud detection, where missing a fraudulent transaction (low recall) is as critical as incorrectly flagging a legitimate one (low precision).

Precision vs. Recall

The Significance of the Precision-Recall Curve

The precision-recall curve is a graphical representation that showcases the relationship between precision and recalls for different threshold settings. It helps visualize the trade-off and select an optimal threshold that balances both metrics. 

It is especially valuable for imbalanced datasets where one class is significantly underrepresented compared to others. In these scenarios, traditional metrics like accuracy can be misleading, as they might reflect the predominance of the majority class rather than the model's ability to identify the minority class correctly. 

The precision-recall curve measures how well the minority class is predicted. The measurement checks how accurately we make positive predictions and detect actual positives. The curve is an important tool for assessing model performance in imbalanced datasets. It helps choose an optimal threshold that balances precision and recall effectively.

The closer this curve approaches the top-right corner of the graph, the more capable the model is at achieving high precision and recall simultaneously, indicating a robust performance in distinguishing between classes, regardless of their frequency in the dataset.

Precision Recall Curve

Importance of Setting the Right Threshold for Classification

Adjusting the classification threshold directly impacts the shape and position of the precision-recall curve. A lower threshold typically increases recall but reduces precision, shifting the curve towards higher recall values. Conversely, a higher threshold improves precision at the expense of recall, moving the curve towards higher precision values. 

The precision-recall curve shows how changing thresholds affect precision and recall balance. This helps us choose the best threshold for the application's specific needs.

Precision vs. Recall: Which Metric Should You Choose?

The choice between precision and recall often hinges on the specific application and the associated costs of errors. Both metrics offer unique insights, but their importance varies based on the problem.

Scenarios Where Precision is More Important Than Recall

Precision becomes paramount when the cost of false positives is high. For instance, consider an email marketing campaign. If a company has many email addresses and pays a high cost for each email, it is important to ensure that the recipients are likely to respond. High precision ensures that most emails are sent to potential customers, minimizing wasted resources on those unlikely to engage.

Scenarios Where Recall is More Important Than Precision

Recall takes precedence when the cost of missing a positive instance (false negatives) is substantial. A classic example is in healthcare, specifically in administering flu shots. If you don't give a flu shot to someone who needs it, it could have serious health consequences. Also, giving a flu shot to someone who doesn't need it has a small cost. In such a scenario, healthcare providers might offer the flu shot to a broader audience, prioritizing recall over precision.

Real-World Examples Illustrate the Choice Between Precision and Recall

Consider a weekly website with thousands of free registrations. The goal is to identify potential buyers among these registrants. While calling a non-buyer (false positive) isn't detrimental, missing out on a genuine buyer (false negative) could mean lost revenue. Here, high recall is desired, even if it compromises precision.

In another scenario, imagine a store with 100 apples, of which 10 are bad. A method with a 20% recall might identify only 18 good apples, but if a shopper only wants 5 apples, the missed opportunities (false negatives) are inconsequential. However, a higher recall becomes essential for the store aiming to sell as many apples as possible.

Classification Metrics: Key Takeaways

Evaluation Metrics: Accuracy, precision, and recall remain foundational in assessing a machine learning model's predictive capabilities. These metrics are especially relevant in binary and multi-class classification scenarios, often involving imbalanced datasets.

Accuracy: Provides a straightforward measure of a model's overall correctness across all classes but needs to be more accurate in imbalanced datasets, where one class (the majority class) might dominate.
Change: Mentioned "majority class" to address "imbalanced datasets."

Precision vs. Recall: Precision, highlighting the true positives and minimizing false positives, contrasts with recall, which focuses on capturing all positive instances and minimizing false negatives. The choice depends on the application's specific needs and the cost of errors.

Confusion Matrix: Categorizes predictions into True Positives, True Negatives, False Positives, and False Negatives, offering a detailed view of a model's performance. This is essential in evaluating classifiers and their effectiveness.

Precision-Recall Curve: Showcases the relationship between precision and recall for different threshold settings, which is crucial for understanding the trade-off in a classifier's performance.

Classification Threshold: Adjusting this threshold in a machine learning model can help balance precision and recall, directly impacting the true positive rate and precision score.

Context is Key: The relevance of precision, recall, and accuracy varies based on the nature of the problem, such as in a regression task or when high precision is critical for the positive class.

Evaluate your models and build active learning pipelines with Encord

Try Encord today