What is the F1 score used for?

The F1 score is a machine learning evaluation metric used to assess the performance of classification models.

What is a poor F1 score?

F1 score lies in the range of 0 and 1. Typically, a poor F1 score is less than 0.5.

How do you interpret the F1 score?

Typically, an F1 score > 0.9 is considered excellent. A score between 0.8 and 0.9 is considered good, while a score between 0.5 to 0.8 is considered average. If the F1 score falls below 0.5, then the model is considered to have a poor performance.

Why use F1 score instead of accuracy?

Accuracy measures the number of accurately classified positive and negative predictions, while the F1 score balances the precision and recall values. If the dataset is imbalanced, then the accuracy metric gives poor results or leads to inaccurate interpretation of model performance. In this case, the F1 score metric gives a more stable model performance evaluation.

What is the F1 score in binary classification?

For binary classification, the F1 score determines the harmonic mean of precision and recall values between two class labels, i.e., positive and negative.

What is the difference between the F1 score and AUC?

F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, while AUC measures the two-dimensional area under the ROC plot with FPR on the x-axis and TPR on the y-axis. It provides a measure of model performance at all classification thresholds.

How does the F1 score compare to other evaluation scores?

The F1 score is considered a more stable evaluation metric for classification problems compared to accuracy, precision, and recall. This is because the F1 score metric tries to achieve a balance between the number and the quality of accurate model predictions.

Back to Blogs

Contents

Encord Blog

F1 Score in Machine Learning

July 18, 2023

8 mins

Back to Blogs

Contents

Written by

Nikolaj Buhl

View more posts

Machine learning (ML) has enabled companies to leverage large volumes of data to develop powerful models, generate insightful predictions, and make informed business decisions.

But to ensure the quality of the ML pipeline, it is important to be able to conduct an in-depth evaluation of model performance.

For this purpose, ML practitioners use evaluation metrics to determine the effectiveness of machine learning models. For instance, the F1 score is a fundamental metric for evaluating classification models and understanding how this metric works is crucial to ensure your classification model’s performance.

In this article, we will dive into:

The significance of evaluation metrics in machine learning
The fundamentals of classification metrics
Understanding & interpreting the F1 score metric
ML applications where the F1 score metric is critical
Limitations & caveats of F1 score metric
F-score variants
Model evaluation with Encord Active

Evaluate model performances with diverse metrics and compare different models easily with Encord Active

Clean & curate data smartly

Create quality labels quickly

Validate your label quality

Evaluate & monitor your models

Book a live demo

Evaluation Metrics in Machine Learning

Evaluation metrics play a critical role in improving the accuracy, efficiency, quality, and effectiveness of machine learning models by providing objective and quantitative performance measures.

For ML tasks, evaluation metrics:

Provide model performance insights, i.e., data quality, correctness, error types, bias, and fairness.
Assess the reliability and correctness of the model’s prediction
Guide model selection by allowing a fair comparison of model variants
Inform the hyperparameter tuning process
Identify model limitations
Aid stakeholders in decision-making

Using multiple metrics to evaluate model performance is a common practice in ML tasks since a model can give good outcomes on one metric and perform suboptimally for another. In such cases, practitioners try to find a balance between various metrics.

Scale your annotation workflows and power your model performance with data-driven insights

Different ML Tasks Have Different Evaluation Metrics

ML tasks have unique objectives, and their corresponding models have distinct parameters and properties. Hence, there’s no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to evaluating ML models for different tasks. For instance:

Classification tasks require metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC-ROC.
Regression tasks employ metrics like Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and R-squared.
Clustering tasks are evaluated using metrics like the Silhouette score, Dunn index, and Rand index.
Ranking & recommendation tasks use metrics like MAP, NDCG, and precision at K.

💡 Interested in learning about computer vision metrics? Here’s our Introductory Guide to Quality Metrics in Computer Vision.

Before discussing the F1 score metric, let's understand the basics of classification metrics in more detail.

Fundamentals of Classification Metrics

Typically, classification tasks are categorized as binary classification (datasets with two classes or labels) and multi-class classification (datasets with more than two classes). Hence, classification models or classifiers try to predict labels or classes for the given data.

Classification Prediction Outcomes

Classifiers can have four possible outcomes:

True Positives (TP): Events correctly predicted as positive.
True Negatives (TN): Events accurately predicted as negative.
False Positives (FP): Events wrongly predicted as positive when they were negative.
False Negatives (FN): Events wrongly predicted as negative when they were positive.

Most classification metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall (also known as sensitivity or true positive rate), specificity (true negative rate), F1 score (harmonic mean of precision and recall), and area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) use the above four outcomes for calculating metric values.

Sample outcomes of binary classification model

Table 1: Sample outcomes of a binary classification model

Confusion Matrix

A confusion matrix is a useful tool to evaluate the performance of a classification model by mapping its actual and predicted values. In binary classification tasks, it is a table that shows the four prediction outcomes discussed above: true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. This two-dimensional matrix allows ML practitioners to summarize prediction outcomes in order to seamlessly calculate the model's precision, recall, F1 score, and other metrics. Consider the following confusion matrix as an example:

Confusion matrix illustration

Illustration of confusion matrix

Understanding Accuracy, Precision & Recall

Accuracy

The accuracy metric calculates the overall prediction correctness by dividing the number of correctly predicted positive and negative events by the total number of events. The formula for calculating accuracy is

Let’s use the data of the model outcomes from Table 1 to calculate the accuracy of a simple classification model:

Typically, an accuracy score above 0.7 describes an average model performance, whereas a score above 0.9 indicates a good model. However, the relevance of the score is determined by the task. Accuracy alone may not provide a complete picture of model performance, especially In scenarios where class imbalance exists in the dataset. Therefore, to address the constraints of accuracy, precision, and recall metrics are used.

Precision

The precision metric determines the quality of positive predictions by measuring their correctness. It is the number of true positive outcomes divided by the sum of true positive and false positive predictions. The formula applied in calculating precision is:

Using the classification model outcomes from Table 1 above, precision is calculated as

Precision can be thought of as a quality metric; higher precision indicates that an algorithm provides more relevant results than irrelevant ones. It is solely focused on the correctness of positive predictions, with no attention to the correct detection of negative predictions.

Recall

Recall, also called sensitivity, measures the model's ability to detect positive events correctly. It is the percentage of accurately predicted positive events out of all actual positive events. To calculate the recall of a classification model, the formula is

Using the classification model outcomes from Table 1 above, recall is calculated as

A high recall score indicates that the classifier predicts the majority of the relevant results correctly. However, the recall metric does not take into account the potential repercussions of false positives, i.e., occurrences that are wrongly identified as positive – a false alarm. Typically, we would like to avoid such cases, especially in mission-critical applications such as intrusion detection, where a non-malicious false alarm increases the workload of overburdened security teams.

While precision and recall give useful information on their own, they also have limitations when viewed separately.

Ideally, we want to build classifiers with high precision and recall. But that’s not always possible. A classifier with high recall may have low precision, meaning it captures the majority of positive classes but produces a considerable number of false positives. Hence, we use the F1 score metric to balance this precision-recall trade-off.

F1 Score Metric

The F1 score or F-measure is described as the harmonic mean of the precision and recall of a classification model. The two metrics contribute equally to the score, ensuring that the F1 metric correctly indicates the reliability of a model.

It’s important to note that calculating the F1 score using arithmetic mean may not appropriately represent the model's overall performance, especially when precision and recall have considerably varied values. That’s because the arithmetic mean focuses on the sum of values and their average.

On the other hand, the harmonic mean emphasizes the reciprocal of values. It is computed by dividing the total number of values by the sum of their reciprocals. Hence, it enhances the effect of the smaller value on the overall calculation to achieve a balanced measurement. As a result, the F1 score takes into account both precision-recall while avoiding the overestimation that the arithmetic mean might cause.

The F1 score formula is

Using the classification model outcomes from Table 1, the F1 score is calculated as

Here, you can observe that the harmonic mean of precision and recall creates a balanced measurement, i.e., the model's precision is not optimized at the price of recall, or vice versa. Hence, the F1 score shows a strong performance in recognizing positive cases while minimizing false positives and false negatives. This makes it a suitable metric when recall and precision must be optimized simultaneously, especially in imbalanced datasets. As a result, the F1 score metric directs real-world decision-making more accurately.

Interpreting the F1 Score

The F1 score ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 denoting the lowest possible result and 1 denoting a flawless result, meaning that the model accurately predicted each label.

A high F1 score generally indicates a well-balanced performance, demonstrating that the model can concurrently attain high precision and high recall. A low F1 score often signifies a trade-off between recall and precision, implying that the model has trouble striking that balance. As a general rule of thumb, the F1 score value can be interpreted as follows:

What is a good F1 score and how do I interpret it?

However, depending on the task requirements, model use case, and the tolerance for mistakes, the precise threshold for what is considered “low” might also change. For instance, a simple decision tree classifier and a multi-layered deep learning neural network would have different ranges for high or low F1 scores.

Now, let's consider various ML applications where model evaluation requires a balance of precision and recall, deeming the F1 score as a more suitable evaluation metric.

ML Applications of F1 Score

Medical Diagnostics

In medical diagnostics, it is important to acquire a high recall while correctly detecting positive occurrences, even if doing so necessitates losing precision. For instance, the F1 score of a cancer detection classifier should minimize the possibility of false negatives, i.e., patients with malignant cancer, but the classifier wrongly predicts as benign.

Collaborative DICOM annotation platform for medical imaging

CT, X-ray, mammography, MRI, PET scans, ultrasound

Sentiment Analysis

For natural language processing (NLP) tasks like sentiment analysis, recognizing both positive and negative sentiments in textual data allow businesses to assess public opinion, consumer feedback, and brand sentiment. Hence, the F1 score allows for an efficient evaluation of sentiment analysis models by taking precision and recall into account when categorizing sentiments.

Fraud Detection

In fraud detection, by considering both precision (the accuracy with which fraudulent cases are discovered) and recall (the capacity to identify all instances of fraud), the F1 score enables practitioners to assess fraud detection models more accurately. For instance, the figure below shows the evaluation metrics for a credit card fraud detection model.

Implementation of Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Random Forest Algorithm

Limitations of F1 Score

ML practitioners must be aware of the following limits and caveats of the F1 score when interpreting its results.

Dataset Class Imbalance

For imbalanced data, when one class significantly outweighs the other, the regular F1 scoremetric might not give a true picture of the model's performance. This is because the regular F1 score gives precision and recall equal weight, but in datasets with imbalances, achieving high precision or recall for the minority class may result in a lower F1 score due to the majority class's strong influence.

💡 Interested in learning more about class imbalance in datasets? Read our Introductory Blog on Balanced and Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning.

Cost Associated with False Prediction Outcomes

False positives and false negatives can have quite diverse outcomes depending on the application. In medical diagnostics, as discussed earlier, a false negative is more dangerous than a false positive. Hence, the F1 score must be interpreted carefully.

Contextual Dependence

The evaluation of the F1 score varies depending on the particular problem domain and task objectives. Various interpretations of what constitutes a high or low F1 score for different applications require various precision-recall criteria. Hence, a thorough understanding of the domain and the task at hand is needed to use and interpret the F1 score properly.

F-score Variants

To resolve severe class imbalance issues and achieve an appropriate balance between precision and recall, practitioners often use the following two variants of the F-score metric:

F2 Score

This variant places more emphasis on recall than precision. It is suitable for circumstances where detecting true positives is crucial. During the harmonic mean computation, recall is given more weightage.

The F2 score formula is as follows:

F-beta Score

This variant offers a dynamic blend of recall and precision by changing the beta parameter — weight coefficient which should be greater than 0. Based on the particular task requirements, practitioners can change the beta value, i.e., beta < 1 favors precision, and beta > 1 favors recall.

The F-beta score is calculated using the same formula as the F2 score, with beta dictating the importance of recall against precision.

Supplementing the F1 Score

Other performance metrics, such as the Area Under the Curve-Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) can be used in addition to the F1 score to offer supplementary insights into an artificial intelligence model performance.

The AUC-ROC metric evaluates the model's capability to differentiate between positive and negative classes across various classification criteria or decision thresholds by plotting the true positive rate (TPR) versus the false positive rate (FPR), as illustrated below.

TP vs. FP rate at different classification thresholds

Future Research for F1 Score

As data science grows, researchers and practitioners continue to investigate the challenges posed by imbalanced datasets. Modified F1 scores that account for class imbalance are being developed to improve performance evaluation.

Another important area of focus for evaluation measures is fairness and ethics. The goal is to ensure that metrics take into account fairness towards specific subgroups or protected traits in addition to overall performance.

Moreover, another research proposes a new discriminant metric to gauge how well AI models perform in maximizing risk-adjusted return for financial tasks after arguing that metrics like the F1 score were unsatisfactory for evaluation.

Model Evaluation with Encord Active

Encord Active is an ML platform that helps practitioners build better models. It offers the following features:

Evaluation metrics visualization with intuitive charts and graphs
Auto-identification of labeling errors
Search and curate high-value visual data using natural language search
Find and fix bias, drift, and dataset errors
Find model failure modes with automated robustness tests
Compare your datasets and models based on a detailed metrics evaluation

Hence, it provides practitioners with a variety of evaluation approaches and measures, including the well-known F1 score, accuracy, precision, and recall. With Encord Active, data scientists can evaluate machine learning models quickly because of its simple user interface and easy-to-understand evaluation process.

Scale your annotation workflows and power your model performance with data-driven insights

Build better ML models with Encord

Get started today

Written by

Nikolaj Buhl

View more posts

Frequently asked questions

The F1 score is a machine learning evaluation metric used to assess the performance of classification models.
F1 score lies in the range of 0 and 1. Typically, a good F1 score is greater than 0.9. However, the relevant machine learning task for which the F1 score is being measured determines the goodness criteria.
F1 score lies in the range of 0 and 1. Typically, a poor F1 score is less than 0.5.
Typically, an F1 score > 0.9 is considered excellent. A score between 0.8 and 0.9 is considered good, while a score between 0.5 to 0.8 is considered average. If the F1 score falls below 0.5, then the model is considered to have a poor performance.
Accuracy measures the number of accurately classified positive and negative predictions, while the F1 score balances the precision and recall values. If the dataset is imbalanced, then the accuracy metric gives poor results or leads to inaccurate interpretation of model performance. In this case, the F1 score metric gives a more stable model performance evaluation.
For binary classification, the F1 score determines the harmonic mean of precision and recall values between two class labels, i.e., positive and negative.
F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, while AUC measures the two-dimensional area under the ROC plot with FPR on the x-axis and TPR on the y-axis. It provides a measure of model performance at all classification thresholds.
The F1 score is considered a more stable evaluation metric for classification problems compared to accuracy, precision, and recall. This is because the F1 score metric tries to achieve a balance between the number and the quality of accurate model predictions.

Previous blog

Text2Cinemagraph: Synthesizing Artistic Cinemagraphs

Next blog

Meet Mavis - Product Designer at Encord

May 11 2023

5 M

machine learning

machine learning

Guide to Image Segmentation in Computer Vision: Best Practices

Image segmentation is a crucial task in computer vision, where the goal is to divide an image into different meaningful and distinguishable regions or objects. It is a fundamental task in various applications such as object recognition, tracking, and detection, medical imaging, and robotics. Many techniques are available for image segmentation, ranging from traditional methods to deep learning-based approaches. With the advent of deep learning, the accuracy and efficiency of image segmentation have improved significantly. In this guide, we will discuss the basics of image segmentation, including different types of segmentation, applications, and various techniques used for image segmentation, including traditional, deep learning, and foundation model techniques. We will also cover evaluation metrics and datasets for evaluating image segmentation algorithms and future directions in image segmentation. By the end of this guide, you will have a better understanding of image segmentation, its applications, and the various techniques used for segmenting images. This guide is for you if you are a data scientist, machine learning engineer or your team is considering using image segmentation as part of an artificial intelligence computer vision project. What is Image Segmentation? Image segmentation is the process of dividing an image into multiple meaningful and homogeneous regions or objects based on their inherent characteristics, such as color, texture, shape, or brightness. Image segmentation aims to simplify and/or change the representation of an image into something more meaningful and easier to analyze. Here, each pixel is labeled. All the pixels belonging to the same category have a common label assigned to them. The task of segmentation can further be done in two ways: Similarity: As the name suggests, the segments are formed by detecting similarity between image pixels. It is often done by thresholding (see below for more on thresholding). Machine learning algorithms (such as clustering) are based on this type of approach for image segmentation. Discontinuity: Here, the segments are formed based on the change of pixel intensity values within the image. This strategy is used by line, point, and edge detection techniques to obtain intermediate segmentation results that may be processed to obtain the final segmented image. Types of Segmentation Image segmentation modes are divided into three categories based on the amount and type of information that should be extracted from the image: Instance, semantic, and panoptic. Let’s look at these various modes of image segmentation methods. Also, to understand the three modes of image segmentation, it would be more convenient to know more about objects and backgrounds. Objects are the identifiable entities in an image that can be distinguished from each other by assigning unique IDs, while the background refers to parts of the image that cannot be counted, such as the sky, water bodies, and other similar elements. By distinguishing between objects and backgrounds, it becomes easier to understand the different modes of image segmentation and their respective applications. Instance Segmentation Instance segmentation is a type of image segmentation that involves detecting and segmenting each object in an image. It is similar to object detection but with the added task of segmenting the object’s boundaries. The algorithm has no idea of the class of the region, but it separates overlapping objects. Instance segmentation is useful in applications where individual objects need to be identified and tracked. Instance segmentation Semantic Segmentation Semantic segmentation is a type of image segmentation that involves labeling each pixel in an image with a corresponding class label with no other information or context taken into consideration. The goal is to assign a label to every pixel in the image, which provides a dense labeling of the image. The algorithm takes an image as input and generates a segmentation map where the pixel value (0,1,...255) of the image is transformed into class labels (0,1,...n). It is useful in applications where identifying the different classes of objects on the road is important. Semantic segmentation - the human and the dog are classified together as mammals and separated from the rest of the background. Panoptic Segmentation Panoptic segmentation is a combination of semantic and instance segmentation. It involves labeling each pixel with a class label and identifying each object instance in the image. This mode of image segmentation provides the maximum amount of high-quality granular information from machine learning algorithms. It is useful in applications where the computer vision model needs to detect and interact with different objects in its environment, like an autonomous robot. Panoptic segmentation Each type of segmentation has its unique characteristics and is useful in different applications. In the following section, let’s discuss the various applications of image segmentation. Image Segmentation Techniques Traditional Techniques Traditional image segmentation techniques have been used for decades in computer vision to extract meaningful information from images. These techniques are based on mathematical models and algorithms that identify regions of an image with common characteristics, such as color, texture, or brightness. Traditional image segmentation techniques are usually computationally efficient and relatively simple to implement. They are often used for applications that require fast and accurate segmentation of images, such as object detection, tracking, and recognition. In this section, we will explore some of the most common techniques. Thresholding Thresholding Thresholding is one of the simplest image segmentation methods. Here, the pixels are divided into classes based on their histogram intensity which is relative to a fixed value or threshold. This method is suitable for segmenting objects where the difference in pixel values between the two target classes is significant. In low-noise images, the threshold value can be kept constant, but with images with noise, dynamic thresholding performs better. In thresholding-based segmentation, the greyscale image is divided into two segments based on their relationship to the threshold value, producing binary images. Algorithms like contour detection and identification work on these binarized images. The two commonly used thresholding methods are: Global thresholding is a technique used in image segmentation to divide images into foreground and background regions based on pixel intensity values. A threshold value is chosen to separate the two regions, and pixels with intensity values above the threshold are assigned to the foreground region and those below the threshold to the background region. This method is simple and efficient but may not work well for images with varying illumination or contrast. In those cases, adaptive thresholding techniques may be more appropriate. Adaptive thresholding is a technique used in image segmentation to divide an image into foreground and background regions by adjusting the threshold value locally based on the image characteristics. The method involves selecting a threshold value for each smaller region or block, based on the statistics of the pixel values within that block. Adaptive thresholding is useful for images with non-uniform illumination or varying contrast and is commonly used in document scanning, image binarization, and image segmentation. The choice of adaptive thresholding technique depends on the specific application requirements and image characteristics. Image showing different thresholding techniques. Source: Author Region-based Segmentation Region-based segmentation is a technique used in image processing to divide an image into regions based on similarity criteria, such as color, texture, or intensity. The method involves grouping pixels into regions or clusters based on their similarity and then merging or splitting regions until the desired level of segmentation is achieved. The two commonly used region-based segmentation techniques are: Split and merge segmentation is a region-based segmentation technique that recursively divides an image into smaller regions until a stopping criterion is met and then merges similar regions to form larger regions. The method involves splitting the image into smaller blocks or regions and then merging adjacent regions that meet certain similarity criteria, such as similar color or texture. Split and merge segmentation is a simple and efficient technique for segmenting images, but it may not work well for complex images with overlapping or irregular regions. Graph-based segmentation is a technique used in image processing to divide an image into regions based on the edges or boundaries between regions. The method involves representing the image as a graph, where the nodes represent pixels, and the edges represent the similarity between pixels. The graph is then partitioned into regions by minimizing a cost function, such as the normalized cut or minimum spanning tree. Example of graph-based image segmentation. Source Edge-based Segmentation Edge-based segmentation is a technique used in image processing to identify and separate the edges of an image from the background. The method involves detecting the abrupt changes in intensity or color values of the pixels in the image and using them to mark the boundaries of the objects. The two most common edge-based segmentation techniques are: Canny edge detection is a popular method for edge detection that uses a multi-stage algorithm to detect edges in an image. The method involves smoothing the image using a Gaussian filter, computing the gradient magnitude and direction of the image, applying non-maximum suppression to thin the edges, and using hysteresis thresholding to remove weak edges. Example of canny edge detection Sobel edge detection is a method for edge detection that uses a gradient-based approach to detect edges in an image. The method involves computing the gradient magnitude and direction of the image using a Sobel operator, which is a convolution kernel that extracts horizontal and vertical edge information separately. Example of Sobel edge detection. Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) edge detection is a method for edge detection that combines Gaussian smoothing with the Laplacian operator. The method involves applying a Gaussian filter to the image to remove noise and then applying the Laplacian operator to highlight the edges. LoG edge detection is a robust and accurate method for edge detection, but it is computationally expensive and may not work well for images with complex edges. Example of Laplacian of Gaussian edge detection. Clustering Clustering is one of the most popular techniques used for image segmentation, as it can group pixels with similar characteristics into clusters or segments. The main idea behind clustering-based segmentation is to group pixels into clusters based on their similarity, where each cluster represents a segment. This can be achieved using various clustering algorithms, such as K means clustering, mean shift clustering, hierarchical clustering, and fuzzy clustering. K-means clustering is a widely used clustering algorithm for image segmentation. In this approach, the pixels in an image are treated as data points, and the algorithm partitions these data points into K clusters based on their similarity. The similarity is measured using a distance metric, such as Euclidean distance or Mahalanobis distance. The algorithm starts by randomly selecting K initial centroids, and then iteratively assigns each pixel to the nearest centroid and updates the centroids based on the mean of the assigned pixels. This process continues until the centroids converge to a stable value. ‍ Showing the result of segmenting the image at k=2,4,10. Source Mean shift clustering is another popular clustering algorithm used for image segmentation. In this approach, each pixel is represented as a point in a high-dimensional space, and the algorithm shifts each point toward the direction of the local density maximum. This process is repeated until convergence, where each pixel is assigned to a cluster based on the nearest local density maximum. Source ‍Though these techniques are simple, they are fast and memory efficient. But these techniques are more suitable for simpler segmentation tasks as well. They often require tuning to customize the algorithm as per the use case and also provide limited accuracy on complex scenes. Deep Learning Techniques Neural networks also provide solutions for image segmentation by training neural networks to identify which features are important in an image, rather than relying on customized functions like in traditional algorithms. Neural nets that perform the task of segmentation typically use an encoder-decoder structure. The encoder extracts features of an image through narrower and deeper filters. If the encoder is pre-trained on a task like an image or face recognition, it then uses that knowledge to extract features for segmentation (transfer learning). The decoder then over a series of layers inflates the encoder’s output into a segmentation mask resembling the pixel resolution of the input image. The basic architecture of the neural network model for image segmentation. Source ‍ Many deep learning models are quite adept at performing the task of segmentation reliably. Let’s have a look at a few of them: U-Net U-Net is a modified, fully convolutional neural network. It was primarily proposed for medical purposes, i.e., to detect tumors in the lungs and brain. It has the same encoder and decoder. The encoder is used to extract features using a shortcut connection, unlike in fully convolutional networks, which extract features by upsampling. The shortcut connection in the U-Net is designed to tackle the problem of information loss. In the U-Net architecture, the encoders and decoders are designed in such a manner that the network captures finer information and retains more information by concatenating high-level features with low-level ones. This allows the network to yield more accurate results. U-Net Architecture. Source‍ SegNet SegNet is also a deep fully convolutional network that is designed especially for semantic pixel-wise segmentation. Like U-Net, SegNet’s architecture also consists of encoder and decoder blocks. The SegNet differs from other neural networks in the way it uses its decoder for upsampling the features. The decoder network uses the pooling indices computed in the max-pooling layer which in turn makes the encoder perform non-linear upsampling. This eliminates the need for learning to upsample. SegNet is primarily designed for scene-understanding applications. SegNet Architecture. Source DeepLab DeepLab is primarily a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture. Unlike the other two networks, it uses features from every convolutional block and then concatenates them to their deconvolutional block. The neural network uses the features from the last convolutional block and upsamples it like the fully convolutional network (FCN). It uses the atrous convolution or dilated convolution method for upsampling. The advantage of atrous convolution is that the computation cost is reduced while capturing more information. The encoder-Decoder architecture of DeepLab v3. Source Foundation Model Techniques Foundation models have also been used for image segmentation, which divides an image into distinct regions or segments. Unlike language models, which are typically based on transformer architectures, foundation models for image segmentation often use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) designed to handle image data. Segment Anything Model Segment Anything Model (SAM) is considered the first foundation model for image segmentation. SAM is built on the largest segmentation dataset to date, with over 1 billion segmentation masks. It is trained to return a valid segmentation mask for any prompt, where a prompt can be foreground/background points, a rough box or mask, freeform text, or general information indicating what to segment in an image. Under the hood, an image encoder produces a one-time embedding for the image, while a lightweight encoder converts any prompt into an embedding vector in real time. These two information sources are combined in a lightweight decoder that predicts segmentation masks.‍ Source Metrics for Evaluating Image Segmentation Algorithms Pixel Accuracy Pixel accuracy is a common evaluation metric used in image segmentation to measure the overall accuracy of the segmentation algorithm. It is defined as the ratio of the number of correctly classified pixels to the total number of pixels in the image. Pixel accuracy is a straightforward and easy-to-understand metric that provides a quick assessment of the segmentation performance. However, it does not account for the spatial alignment between the ground truth and the predicted segmentation, which can be important in some applications. In addition, pixel accuracy can be sensitive to class imbalance, where one class has significantly more pixels than another. This can lead to a biased evaluation of the algorithm's performance. Dice Coefficient The dice coefficient measures the similarity between two sets of binary data, in this case, the ground truth segmentation and the predicted segmentation. The dice coefficient is calculated as Where intersection is the number of pixels that are correctly classified as positive by both the ground truth and predicted segmentations, and ground truth and predicted are the total number of positive pixels in the respective segmentations. The Dice coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better segmentation performance. A value of 1 indicates a perfect overlap between the ground truth and predicted segmentations. The Dice coefficient is a popular metric for image segmentation because it is sensitive to small changes in the segmentation and is not affected by class imbalance. However, it does not account for the spatial alignment between the ground truth and predicted segmentation, which can be important in some applications. Jaccard Index (IOU) The Jaccard index, also known as the intersection over union (IoU) score, measures the similarity between the ground truth segmentation and the predicted segmentation. It is formulated as Where intersection is the number of pixels that are correctly classified as positive by both the ground truth and predicted segmentations, and ground truth and predicted are the total number of positive pixels in the respective segmentations. The IoU score ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better segmentation performance. A value of 1 indicates a perfect overlap between the ground truth and predicted segmentations. The Jaccard index takes into account both the true positives and false positives and is not affected by class imbalance. It also accounts for the spatial alignment between the ground truth and predicted segmentations. Datasets for Evaluating Image Segmentation Algorithms The evaluation of image segmentation algorithms is a crucial task n computer vision research. To measure the performance of these algorithms, various benchmark datasets have been developed. We will be discussing three popular datasets for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. These datasets provide carefully annotated images with pixel-level annotations, allowing researchers to test and compare the effectiveness of their segmentation algorithms. Barkley Segmentation Dataset and Benchmark The Barkley Segmentation Dataset is a standard benchmark for contour detection. This dataset is intended for testing natural edge detection, which takes into account background boundaries in addition to object interior and exterior boundaries as well as object contours. It includes 500 natural images with carefully annotated boundaries collected from multiple users. The dataset is divided into three parts: 200 for training, 100 for validation, and the rest 200 for testing. Pascal VOC Segmentation Dataset The Pascal VOC Segmentation Dataset is a popular benchmark dataset for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. It contains images from 20 object categories and provides pixel-level annotations for each image. The dataset is divided into the train, validation, and test sets, with the test set used to evaluate the performance of segmentation algorithms. The Pascal VOC Segmentation Dataset has been used as a benchmark for various computer vision challenges, including the Pascal VOC Challenge and the COCO Challenge. MS COCO Segmentation Dataset The Microsoft Common Objects in Context (COCO) Segmentation Dataset is another widely used dataset for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. It contains over 330,000 images with object annotations, including segmentations of 80 object categories. The dataset is divided into the train, validation, and test sets, with the test set containing around 5,000 images. The MS COCO Segmentation Dataset is often used as a benchmark for evaluating segmentation algorithms in various computer vision challenges, including the COCO Challenge. Future Direction of Image Segmentation Auto-Segmentation with SAM Auto-segmentation refers to the process of automatically segmenting an image without human intervention. Auto-segmentation with Meta’s Segment Anything Model (SAM) has instantly become popular as it shows remarkable performance in image segmentation tasks. It is a single model that can easily perform both interactive segmentation and automatic segmentation. Since SAM is trained on a diverse, high-quality dataset, it can generalize to new types of objects and images beyond what is observed during training. This ability to generalize means that by and large, practitioners will no longer need to collect their segmentation data and fine-tune a model for their use case. Improvement in segmentation accuracy Improving segmentation accuracy is one of the main goals of researchers in the field of computer vision. Accurate segmentation is essential for various applications, including medical imaging, object recognition, and autonomous vehicles. While deep learning techniques have led to significant improvements in segmentation accuracy in recent years, there is still much room for improvement. Here are some ways researchers are working to improve segmentation accuracy: Incorporating additional data sources: One approach to improving segmentation accuracy is incorporating additional data sources beyond the raw image data. For example, depth information can provide valuable cues for object boundaries and segmentation, particularly in complex scenes with occlusions and clutter. Developing new segmentation algorithms: Researchers continuously develop new algorithms for image segmentation that can improve accuracy. For example, some recent approaches use adversarial training or reinforcement learning to refine segmentation results. Improving annotation quality: The quality of the ground truth annotations used to train segmentation algorithms is essential to achieving high accuracy. Researchers are working to improve annotation quality through various means, including incorporating expert knowledge and utilizing crowdsourcing platforms. Refining evaluation metrics: Evaluation metrics play a crucial role in measuring the accuracy of segmentation algorithms. Researchers are exploring new evaluation metrics beyond the traditional Dice coefficient and Jaccard index, such as the Boundary F1 score, which can better capture the quality of object boundaries. Integrate Deep Learning with Traditional Techniques While deep learning techniques have shown remarkable performance in segmentation tasks, traditional techniques such as clustering, thresholding, and morphological operations can still provide useful insights and improve accuracy. Here are some ways researchers are integrating deep learning with traditional techniques in image segmentation: Hybrid models: Researchers are developing hybrid models that combine deep learning with traditional techniques. For example, some approaches use clustering or thresholding to initialize deep learning models or post-process segmentation results. Multi-stage approaches: Multi-stage approaches involve using deep learning for initial segmentation and then refining the results using traditional techniques. For example, some approaches use morphological operations to smooth and refine segmentation results. Attention-based models: Attention-based models are a type of deep learning model that incorporates traditional techniques for computing attention weights within a feature map. Attention-based models can improve accuracy by focusing on relevant image features and ignoring irrelevant ones. Transfer learning: Transfer learning involves pretraining deep learning models on large datasets and then fine-tuning them for specific segmentation tasks. Traditional techniques such as clustering or thresholding can be used to identify relevant features for transfer learning. Applications of Image Segmentation Image segmentation has a wide range of applications in various fields, including medical imaging, robotics, autonomous vehicles, and surveillance. Here are some examples of how image segmentation is used in different fields: Medical imaging: Image segmentation is widely used in medical imaging for tasks such as tumor detection, organ segmentation, and disease diagnosis. Accurate segmentation is essential for treatment planning and monitoring disease progression. Robotics: Image segmentation is used in robotics for object recognition and manipulation. For example, robots can use segmentation to recognize and grasp specific objects, such as tools or parts, in industrial settings. Autonomous vehicles: Image segmentation is essential for the development of autonomous vehicles, allowing them to detect and classify objects in their environment, such as other vehicles, pedestrians, and obstacles. Accurate segmentation is crucial for safe and reliable autonomous navigation. Surveillance: Image segmentation is used in surveillance for detecting and tracking objects and people in real-time video streams. Segmentation can help to identify and classify objects of interest, such as suspicious behavior or potential threats. Agriculture: Image segmentation is used in agriculture for crop monitoring, disease detection, and yield prediction. Accurate segmentation can help farmers make informed decisions about crop management and optimize crop yields. Art and design: Image segmentation is used in art and design for tasks such as image manipulation, color correction, and style transfer. Segmentation can help to separate objects or regions of an image and apply different effects or modifications to them. Image Segmentation: Key Takeaways Image segmentation is a powerful technique that allows us to identify and separate different objects or regions within an image. It has a wide range of applications in fields such as medical imaging, robotics, and computer vision. In this guide, we covered various image segmentation techniques, including traditional techniques such as thresholding, region-based segmentation, edge-based segmentation, and clustering, as well as deep learning and foundation model techniques. We also discussed different evaluation metrics and datasets used to evaluate segmentation algorithms. As image segmentation continues to advance, future directions will focus on improving segmentation accuracy, integrating deep learning with traditional techniques, and exploring new applications in various fields. Auto-segmentation with the Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a promising direction that can reduce manual intervention and improve accuracy. Integration of deep learning with traditional techniques can also help to overcome the limitations of individual techniques and improve overall performance. With ongoing research and development, we can expect image segmentation to continue to make significant contributions to various fields and industries. Further Reading on Image Segmentation Comparing Two Object Segmentation Models: Mask-RCNN vs. Personalized-SAM Deep Learning Techniques for Medical Image Segmentation: Achievements and Challenges Visual Segmentation of “Simple” Objects for Robots Best practices in deep learning based segmentation of microscopy image Image segmentation: Papers with code

Nov 07 2022

15 M

Software To Help You Turn Your Data Into AI

Forget fragmented workflows, annotation tools, and Notebooks for building AI applications. Encord Data Engine accelerates every step of taking your model into production.